SpermComet

The SpermComet is a specialised test performed to check a man’s sperm quality and DNA health.

It can identify DNA sperm damage and this can help couples make an informed decision about their assisted conception options.

What is the SpermComet test?

A SpermComet test checks the quality of a man’s sperm. It looks at DNA sperm damage including measuring the actual damage in individual sperm. Sperm DNA damage has been shown to be a good biomarker for both male infertility diagnosis and ART prognosis*. Good quality sperm DNA is vital for normal fertilisation, embryo development, and successful implantation and pregnancy in both natural and assisted reproduction. 

Why have the SpermComet test?

The SpermComet test offers men and couples more information regarding their fertility status. This can be useful in deciding the best individual pathway to achieve a healthy pregnancy.

One in six couples has difficulty having a baby. 40 per cent of these couples having difficulty conceiving can be associated with the man. Looking at male fertility and having the SpermComet test may assist couples to find the cause of their infertility.

Men produce new sperm every 70 days so simple changes in lifestyle can improve sperm DNA quality in a short time.

When to have the SpermComet test

Your consultant will discuss with you the SpermComet test if they recommend it for you. Our clinic may offer patients the SpermComet if they have a history of: recurrent implant failure, failed IVF cycle with poor fertilisation rate and/or unexpectedly poor embryological development and recurrent miscarriages.

How much is the SpermComet test?

At Complete Fertility Centre Southampton the SpermComet test is £399.

Book your SpermComet test

Call us on 023 8120 6980 or email us at info@completefertility.co.uk for further information or to book an appointment for the SpermComet test.

Reference: 
* Simon L, Proutski I, Stevenson M, Jennings M, McManus J, Lutton D, Lewis SEM. Sperm DNA damage has negative association with live birth rates after IVF. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, (2013) 26 (1): 68-78